Skip to main content

Summary of LCP Changes Effective April 1, 2010

Filipiniana News - Rhyme or Reason
April 2010                               

Nearly four months after Minister Jason Kenney’s announcement in December 2009 regarding the changes to the Live-in Caregiver Program (LCP), Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) finally released the implementing guidelines for these changes which took effect on April 1, 2010.  A summary of these guidelines follow.  

Administrative Changes

The following changes affect the processing of LCP work permit applications where the related applications for a labour market opinion (LMO) are received by Service Canada on or after April 1, 2010.   These changes mainly pertain to the additional requirements in the signed employment contracts between the live-in caregivers and their employers.  Under these changes, the prospective employers must agree to pay for the following benefits in favor of their prospective caregivers:
·         transportation to Canada from the live-in caregiver’s country of permanent residence or their country of habitual residence to the location of work in Canada
·         medical insurance coverage provided from the date of the live-in caregiver’s arrival until he or she is eligible for provincial health insurance
·         workplace safety insurance coverage for the duration of employment  and
·         all recruitment fees, including any amounts payable to a third-party recruiter or agents hired by the employer that would otherwise have been charged to the live-in caregiver.

In addition to the old requirement of specifying the job duties, hours of work, wages, accommodation arrangements (including room and board), holiday and sick leave entitlements, LCP contracts are now required to include provisions on termination and resignation terms. The CIC and Service Canada websites provide a new sample contract for this purpose which outlines the above requirements in great detail.  

Regulatory Changes  

The regulatory changes on the other hand, mainly pertain to two aspects of the LCP permanent residence application: the medical examination and employment requirements. 

A. Removal of the Second Medical Examination

The new regulations provide that those who will or have applied for their initial LCP work permits (from a visa office outside of Canada) will, as a rule, not anymore be required to undergo a second medical examination.  Instead, the medical examination conducted when caregivers apply for their initial LCP work permits will become more extensive in that it will include not only an examination of health condition that could pose a risk to Canadian society but also that which could potentially trigger an excessive demand on health and social services in Canada.

However, it must also be noted that: “Officers retain the discretion to request a medical examination at the application for permanent residence stage…. Instructions regarding the basis for requesting medical examinations at the application for permanent residence stage over the longer term will follow. These instructions will be designed to ensure that, over the long term, such requests will be rare and the exception to the rule.” (Operational Bulletin 192, 1 April 2010)
In the event that a live-in caregiver is required to undergo a second medical examination as part of the LCP permanent residence application, and it appears that the medical examination results could lead to a refusal of the application, “officers are encouraged to take a generous view” of requests for exemption from inadmissibility or written requests for consideration on humanitarian and compassionate grounds.
B. Extension of LCP Employment Period to Four Years and 3,900 Hours

The second regulatory change is two-fold: a) live-in caregivers now have four years (instead of three) within which to complete the two years of full time caregiving employment within a Canadian household;  and that  b) the two-year full time caregiving requirement can now be met by proving either 24 months of full–time live-in caregiving work or 3,900 hours of live-in caregiving work within a minimum period of 22 months (but which may include only a maximum of 390 hours of overtime work). 

If the caregiver chooses to satisfy the employment requirement by proving 3,900 hours of live-in caregiving work, the following documentary requirements must be submitted with their LCP permanent residence applications:  a) timesheets signed by current and previous employers clearly indicating the date and number of hours worked for all overtime hours claimed; and b) the new Live-in Caregiver Employer Declaration of Hours Worked (IMM 5634) form completed and signed by current and previous employers. 
Implementation and Continued Advocacy 
While these changes will surely benefit many LCP participants, it remains to be seen if these will indeed result in reducing if not eradicating the problems arising from this program.   As is well known, strict enforcement of well-meaning legal reforms is often an entirely different story. . 

Since the LCP work permits are still employer-specific, the caregivers’ immigration status still conditional and precarious, and their dependents remain subject to criminal and medical checks at the PR application stage, I can already foresee the many issues which may still  arise despite these changes.  Although a request for humanitarian and compassionate consideration is one possible remedy to address issues that were not anticipated by these changes, the final decision on such requests is still discretionary hence still quite unpredictable.

Therefore, even as we are very grateful for these recent changes, more work needs to be done in terms of achieving comprehensive, meaningful and lasting reforms for the long disadvantaged caregivers.  

The author is an immigration lawyer in Toronto and may be reached at mdsantos@osgoode.yorku.ca.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

COVID-19 Updates for International Students

In the past few years, the number of international students has ballooned at a rapid pace such that they now comprise a significant portion of the temporary resident population in Canada.  In the latest report of the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) Marco Mendicino to Parliament, he stated that as of December 31, 2018, there were more than 721,000 international study permit holders in Canada, or more than double the number of permanent residents (321,035) admitted that year. Easing Work Restrictions At this time of COVID-19 pandemic therefore, it comes as no surprise that international students are among those hardest hit by the ongoing lockdowns and their economic consequences. Since international student fees are often double or triple the domestic tuition fee rates, one can only imagine the enormous investment that these international students have made to finance their studies and living expenses in Canada.   Hence, it is a great help th

Some Tips to Avoid CIC's 'High Error Rate'

Filipiniana News – January 2015 RHYME & REASON Earlier this month, an article came out in the Toronto Star reporting the existence of a "high error rate" in the processing of immigration applications.  The article by Toronto Star reporter Nicholas Keung on 5 January 2015 states in part: The human errors — staff failing to use correct form letters, address missing documents and provide accurate timelines, among other shortcomings — could not only cost individual applicants a chance to live and work in Canada but affect the "efficiency of the system" and create unnecessary backlogs. "An important area of concerns resides with the letters. The number of request letters not sent, sent incomplete or unclear at initial stage and later on create a negative impact on both clients and the Case Processing Centre (in Vegreville, Alta.)," said an evaluation of operations at Vegreville. It was one of three internal reports obtained under an access to

Temporary Residents and the Removal Process

Filipiniana News   -   October 2016 Rhyme and Reason Temporary Residents and the Removal Process Legal temporary residents in Canada   consist of those who have valid status as students, workers or visitors.   Due to the ever changing state of Canada’s immigration laws and regulations, they are often the most negatively affected to the point of losing their status due to plain ignorance, misinformation or even carelessness.   Those who may have lost their status are understandably fearful of being removed anytime soon and thrown on the next flight back to their home country.   However, misconceptions about the removal process abound and are misleading even temporary residents who may still have valid status in Canada.   For instance, there are those who are   here as visitors, workers or students whose initial permits may have expired but whose extension applications are still pending, who fear that they may just be picked up by the authorities and detained since