Filipiniana News -
Rhyme and Reason
14 June 2009
In the past month or so, the Canadian media have been
speculating on the possibility of a summer election if the opposition party
decides to defeat the present minority government. Long before these recent reports however,
many Canadians have felt like elections are always looming in the horizon, as
the political bickering and mudslinging seem to be occurring non-stop in the
context of the present minority government. Therefore, one cannot help but be
suspicious that the political leaders’ every move is calculated towards the
main objective of defeating their political opponents and winning the next
election.
On the other hand, Filipino-Canadians in Toronto had a
recent breakfast gathering (Kapihan) to hear visiting Philippine Senator
Francis Pangilinan speak. Senator
Pangilinan not only spoke about the current state of Philippine affairs but
also candidly admitted his aspirations for the highest seat in the land. For now, he is running for the
vice-presidency as he believes that while he feels that he is ready for the
job, the Filipino people may not yet be as ready to accept him as President of
the country. He then went on to encourage
Filipinos in Toronto to register and vote in the 2010 Philippine national
elections. Although I have no reason to
doubt his competence and sincere aspirations for the Filipino nation, I also
cannot help but be skeptical about whether the upcoming elections will bring
any significant change to the current Philippine socio-political and economic
conditions.
Why do we need to participate in elections and believe
in what politicians have to say or promise?
The theme of my article last month was that media and politics play an
important role in our democratic systems.
This time, I would like to go further and state that public
participation and response to the interplay of media and politics play an even
more important role in our society. I
would like to believe that it is still the people (or the electorate) who hold
the key to the success or downfall of those who wield political power.
At the breakfast forum, someone in the audience asked,
what can we do to help our motherland, the Philippines? The response given was to the effect that
while there are several things we can do, directly or indirectly, to help our
motherland, this is a personal choice that only we can make. I can only agree. I strongly believe that every time we choose
to do something that helps uplift lives other than our own, then we are
contributing our just share in not only making our democratic systems work, but
also in creating a much better world.
The same is true for those of us who hold dual
citizenships. We can be useful members
of both the Philippine and Canadian societies not only through our votes or
economic contributions, but also by dealing with everyone else in an honest,
humane and respectful manner, regardless of our differences.
If we elect political candidates based on these
fundamental standards that we ought to apply in our own lives, then there may
be some hope that elections will become a truly beneficial aspect of our
democratic systems and not just a futile exercise that it often turns out to
be.
*****
Fact and
Rumour about the Live-in Caregiver Program (LCP)
In the past few months, I have repeatedly been asked
whether live-in caregivers can still apply for permanent resident status after
working for two years as full time live-in caregivers in Canadian households or
whether they will just be granted temporary work permits indefinitely. After having been asked this question at
least a dozen times, I started to wonder where this rumour came from and why
anyone would spread this inaccurate news that has caused panic and extreme
anxiety to many.
As far as I am aware, the LCP has not been changed and
that it is still a hybrid program which allows caregivers to apply for
permanent resident status after satisfying the condition of working as full
time live-in caregivers for two years within three years of arrival in Canada.
While the House of Commons Standing Committee on
Citizenship and Immigration has recently issued a report with recommended
reforms to the LCP (including that of granting conditional permanent resident
status to caregivers upon their arrival in Canada), none of these
recommendations have been enacted or implemented as of this writing. Until these recommendations are acted upon,
the current LCP provisions remain. CIC
Minister Jason Kenney has also hinted at introducing substantive changes to the
LCP before the end of this
year. However,
there is yet no concrete policy pronouncement, legal or regulatory reform in
this regard. Hence, the LCP is still
what it is, and the struggle to achieve genuine reforms continues.
Comments
Post a Comment