Canada’s
immigration law underwent a major overhaul five years ago when a new
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) was enacted in June 2002. Consequently, the first set of permanent
resident cards were issued a few months later, which means that their validity
period of five years had just or will soon expire this year, 2007. This then led to a number of issues arising
among permanent residents who may have left the country after landing as
permanent residents in Canada and who have failed to meet the permanent
residency requirement of 730 days within the last five years.
Under IRPA, the
residency obligation may be satisfied in any of the following ways:
1. physical presence in Canada;
2. if outside Canada accompanying a Canadian
citizen spouse or common-law partner or a is a child accompanying a parent
3. if outside Canada and employed full-time
by a Canadian business or in the public
service of Canada or a province
4. if an accompanying spouse, common-law
partner or child of a permanent resident who is employed full-time by a
Canadian business or is in the public service of Canada or a province.
Unfortunately,
not a few permanent residents learn too late that their “permanent resident”
status in Canada is not so “permanent” after all.
For instance,
those whose permanent resident cards have expired and who do not satisfy any of
the above while they are outside of Canada will have to apply for a travel
document with the nearest Canadian embassy or visa office to be able to return
to Canada. For those who have failed to
comply with the residency obligation, this raises a problem as not only will
the request for a travel document be denied, but that the permanent resident
status will be revoked. This negative
decision can be appealed with the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) of the
Immigration and Refugee Board. Aside
from questions of law and possible denial of natural justice, the IAD also has
jurisdiction to consider humanitarian and compassionate grounds in light of all
the circumstances of the case.
Another matter
that could spell doom for a permanent resident status is that of
misrepresentation.
If it is found
out that there was any misrepresentation of a material fact made in one’s
application for permanent resident status, this can be used as a ground to
initiate inadmissibility proceedings and may eventually lead to removal from
Canada. Some common examples of
misrepresentation involve falsified marital status or undisclosed criminal
records for instance.
Moreover, even
seemingly “minor” criminal offences may mean the end of one’s permanent
resident status in Canada. That is,
because IRPA’s definition of “serious criminality” which could render a
permanent resident inadmissible to Canada includes conviction for any and all
crimes which carry a penalty of “at
least ten years or for which a term of imprisonment of at least six months was
imposed”, even the most mindless acts of criminality may be covered. So if one’s crime is punishable by
“imprisonment not exceeding ten years” even though the actual sentence imposed
is a conditional discharge or one month of community service, this is still caught
within the serious criminality ground for inadmissibility because “not
exceeding ten years” includes a penalty of
“at least ten years”. Hence, it
is often advisable that a permanent resident who is being encouraged to
plea-bargain for a lesser penalty should also be made aware of the potential
effects of such plea to his or her immigration status.
The above
situations are simply meant to illustrate that permanent residence is not
really permanent as some might think. It
can be taken away anytime that residency obligation, misrepresentation or
criminal issues arise.
It is then
strongly advised that permanent residents not become complacent and neglect to
meet their obligations. Better yet,
apply for citizenship status at the earliest opportunity. However, neither should this lead to the
notion that one’s naturalized citizenship status is forever. Even this could be revoked for
misrepresentation and serious criminality issues. So in the end, it does not really matter if
one is a permanent resident or a citizen -
if one makes it a policy to always make full disclosure of relevant
facts and to lead clean and upright lives – Canadian permanent residency or
citizenship will be yours to keep.
The author would be interested to receive
any feedback and may be reached at mdsantos@osgoode.yorku.ca.
Comments
Post a Comment