Skip to main content

Permanent Resident Status – How permanent is it?


Canada’s immigration law underwent a major overhaul five years ago when a new Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) was enacted in June 2002.   Consequently, the first set of permanent resident cards were issued a few months later, which means that their validity period of five years had just or will soon expire this year, 2007.   This then led to a number of issues arising among permanent residents who may have left the country after landing as permanent residents in Canada and who have failed to meet the permanent residency requirement of 730 days within the last five years.   

Under IRPA, the residency obligation may be satisfied in any of the following ways:
1.      physical presence in Canada;
2.      if outside Canada accompanying a Canadian citizen spouse or common-law partner or a is a child accompanying a parent
3.      if outside Canada and employed full-time by a Canadian  business or in the public service of Canada or a province
4.      if an accompanying spouse, common-law partner or child of a permanent resident who is employed full-time by a Canadian business or is in the public service of Canada or a province.

Unfortunately, not a few permanent residents learn too late that their “permanent resident” status in Canada is not so “permanent” after all.

For instance, those whose permanent resident cards have expired and who do not satisfy any of the above while they are outside of Canada will have to apply for a travel document with the nearest Canadian embassy or visa office to be able to return to Canada.   For those who have failed to comply with the residency obligation, this raises a problem as not only will the request for a travel document be denied, but that the permanent resident status will be revoked.  This negative decision can be appealed with the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board.   Aside from questions of law and possible denial of natural justice, the IAD also has jurisdiction to consider humanitarian and compassionate grounds in light of all the circumstances of the case.

Another matter that could spell doom for a permanent resident status is that of misrepresentation.
If it is found out that there was any misrepresentation of a material fact made in one’s application for permanent resident status, this can be used as a ground to initiate inadmissibility proceedings and may eventually lead to removal from Canada.  Some common examples of misrepresentation involve falsified marital status or undisclosed criminal records for instance.

Moreover, even seemingly “minor” criminal offences may mean the end of one’s permanent resident status in Canada.   That is, because IRPA’s definition of “serious criminality” which could render a permanent resident inadmissible to Canada includes conviction for any and all crimes which carry a penalty of  “at least ten years or for which a term of imprisonment of at least six months was imposed”, even the most mindless acts of criminality may be covered.  So if one’s crime is punishable by “imprisonment not exceeding ten years” even though the actual sentence imposed is a conditional discharge or one month of community service, this is still caught within the serious criminality ground for inadmissibility because “not exceeding ten years” includes a penalty of  “at least ten years”.   Hence, it is often advisable that a permanent resident who is being encouraged to plea-bargain for a lesser penalty should also be made aware of the potential effects of such plea to his or her immigration status.

The above situations are simply meant to illustrate that permanent residence is not really permanent as some might think.  It can be taken away anytime that residency obligation, misrepresentation or criminal issues arise. 

It is then strongly advised that permanent residents not become complacent and neglect to meet their obligations.  Better yet, apply for citizenship status at the earliest opportunity.   However, neither should this lead to the notion that one’s naturalized citizenship status is forever.  Even this could be revoked for misrepresentation and serious criminality issues.   So in the end, it does not really matter if one is a permanent resident or a citizen -  if one makes it a policy to always make full disclosure of relevant facts and to lead clean and upright lives – Canadian permanent residency or citizenship will be yours to keep. 
  
The author would be interested to receive any feedback and may be reached at mdsantos@osgoode.yorku.ca. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Changes to the New Caregiver Program – True Reforms or More of the Same?

NB:  This article was submitted for publication before IRCC announced the reduced work experience requirement (from one year to six months) for HCCP and HSW applications that are already in process.  To date, IRCC has not officially started accepting new applications, or released the implementing guidelines, for the new caregiver program which will grant permanent residency at the outset.     Changes to the New Caregiver Program –  True Reforms or More of the Same? CILA(https://cila.co/author/root-2-2-2/) July 2, 2024(https://cila.co/2024/07/02/) Authored by Maria Deanna P. Santos, Immigration Lawyer at Santos Law Office. On 3 June 2024, the IRCC Minister Marc Miller announced changes to the previous Caregiver Pilot Programs which include the following: Caregivers will be granted permanent residence at the outset IRCC is working towards making the caregiver pilot program permanent The language requirement will be lowered to CLB 4 (from the previous CLB 5) T...

The Misrepresentation Trap

Filipiniana News –   November 2019 by Maria Deanna P. Santos Some people are surprised to learn that even a seemingly 'innocent' act of misrepresentation in the immigration context can lead to a five-year bar from reapplying to enter or remain in Canada.  In Canadian immigration law, misrepresentation is defined as “directly or indirectly misrepresenting or withholding material facts relating to a relevant matter that induces or could induce an error in the administration of the Act.”   The "Act", for those who may not be aware, refers to the main source of Canada's immigration law and policy, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). The words, “directly or indirectly,” in the above definition imply that misrepresentation may be committed by the applicant, permanent resident or by other people.   Direct misrepresentation is quite self-explanatory in that it commonly refers to a deliberate act of lying in one's immigration application...

Parental Sponsorship on Hold; 'Amnesty' for Construction Workers

Filipiniana News –   January 2020 by Maria Deanna P. Santos For the start of 2020, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) released the following updates on a couple of its immigration programs which had been much awaited by many and which could potentially have a significant impact on the lives of migrants in Canada.    IRCC Postpones Reopening of Parent-Grandparent Sponsorship Program Many prospective sponsors of parents and grandparents were very disappointed to learn that IRCC has put on hold the parent-grandparent sponsorship program for 2020 until the new ministerial instructions had been released.   No specific date had been provided for their release. In the past years, IRCC had been launching the online interest to sponsor forms at the start of each year to allow prospective sponsors to initiate the sponsorship application process.   Due to various issues which arose from the previous attempts to revise the parental spons...