Not sure when
and how the bad reputation of lawyers started.
And why, of all professions, does it seem to be one of the most
ridiculed, for example, through those unending lawyer jokes?
Recently, this
unflattering reputation was again highlighted on at least two occasions. The first is through a cover story in
MacLean’s magazine entitled, “Lawyers are Rats” featuring an interview with
Philip Slayton, a former Bay St. lawyer and law school dean who wrote a book on
the negative side of the profession, citing a handful of cases where lawyers
were actually held liable for their unprofessional conduct. This understandably raised the ire of many
lawyers and lawyers’ organizations, who maintain that there are a few “bad
eggs” in any profession, and thus should not be used to characterize the entire
“basket”.
The second is a
speech delivered at a recent national conference of lawyers decrying a “crisis
in the legal profession” for its growing inaccessibility to the majority of the
population. While the ultra-rich
individuals and corporations can easily afford lawyers, and the few low-income
people who meet the unrealistic legal aid financial cut-offs are able to obtain
legal aid certificates, the huge middle income population are still left unable
to afford lawyers because of the perceived exorbitant cost of legal services.
Aside from
airing my personal views on this matter,
I wish to avoid sounding defensive on behalf of my fellow lawyers. Rather, this is simply meant to help clarify
some misconceptions about the legal profession and hopefully assist in finding
some solutions (as I also agree that
problems do exist).
For instance,
it needs to be emphasized that lawyers are bound by very strict rules of
professional conduct. These include
guidelines on how to deal with clients, colleagues, co-workers, judges and the
public. Any violation of these guidelines
or code of ethics is a potential ground for being administratively sanctioned
by the Law Society. The fact that
lawyers’ actions are monitored by a regulatory body provides an extra layer of
protection for the public who use the services of a lawyer. It also serves as some kind of an assurance
that lawyers will think twice before doing anything that will prejudice their
hard-earned license to practice the legal profession.
We also know
that lawyers have gone to school for many years, spending precious time and
money to be trained and to master their
craft. Many lawyers may not only have
their undergraduate and law degrees, but are also likely to have taken
additional post-graduate studies and numerous continuing legal education
courses. On top of these, they are
required to pay professional and organization membership dues, professional
liability insurance premiums and other fees required to practice the legal
profession. So the next time you
complain that a lawyer charges too much, it would perhaps help to remember some
of these cost factors in the life of a legal professional. I do not mean of course, to justify the
exorbitant rates that admittedly some lawyers charge. However, there also needs to be some
recognition that not all lawyers are earning megabucks but that there are many,
for instance, who are still struggling to pay-off student loans years after
they have graduated from law school.
With respect to legal fees, many lawyers are considerate enough to
adjust their rates or be flexible with payment terms, in accordance with the
client’s ability to pay.
Pro bono services are of course very much an integral part of
the legal profession. These are provided
by most, if not all lawyers in various ways:
by rendering free legal advice or representation, by volunteering in the
community, by taking active part in various political and social campaigns,
etc.. For most, it is a way of paying
back to society, especially if already gainfully employed and are able to
render free legal services outside of their full time jobs.
Another little
known aspect of legal services is the lawyer-client privilege. This means that when a lawyer-client
relationship is established, communications between the lawyer and the client
are treated in full confidence. Nothing
can be disclosed to anyone unless the privilege is waived or the client
expressly consents. There are a few
exceptions to this principle however, such as when the communication is used to
facilitate a crime. It must be noted as
well, that lawyers are independent from the government (unless of course, they
are employed by the government) or any other institution mandated to implement
the law. Know therefore, that when you
consult a lawyer, your personal information is protected by this rule of
confidentiality.
Lawyers are
generally good people. Many of them
went to law school burning with idealism
and zeal to uphold justice and to make a
difference in society. But like any
human being, they have their weaknesses as well as their strengths. Their perspective and way of doing things are
also greatly influenced by their life experiences.
Let us then
rest assured that there remains a whole lot of lawyers who are trustworthy,
competent and passionate about upholding justice and the rule of law. They are far from being “rats” or “sharks” as
those nasty lawyer jokes often portray.
Yes, jokes are
simply meant to cheer people up rather than be taken seriously – but
it is a whole different matter if they are used to propagate stereotypes and
effectively dismiss the valuable
contributions of an otherwise noble profession.
The author would also be interested to
hear your views on this matter and may be reached at
mdsantos@osgoode.yorku.ca.
Comments
Post a Comment