Skip to main content

“Fairness” Initiatives


Much has been said and written about highly-educated immigrants driving taxis.  To some, it seems like an overused metaphor, but to many others, it is a stark reality.  

Apologies for the oft-heard line, but it seems only right to keep saying it until the officials concerned finally take heed:  foreign-trained professionals are having an extremely difficult time getting their foreign credentials recognized.  The very same education and work experience for which they were admitted to Canada are ironically being disregarded within the Canadian labour market.  How fair is that?

Mr. and Mrs. Premakumaran, a Sri Lankan couple based in Edmonton and who migrated from England (where they lived for 20 years) nine years ago, have tried their utmost best to seek justice for what they claimed to be a fraud committed against them by the Canadian government.  They fiercely argued (without any legal representation) that the Canadian government failed to disclose the fact that their occupational skills, for which they qualified to migrate to Canada, will not be recognized within the Canadian labour market.  As a result, they alleged having suffered physical, financial and psychological harm and sought reparation for the same.  The case was filed before the Federal Court Trial Division where it was dismissed; then brought to the Federal Court of Appeal where it was likewise turned down; and eventually to the Supreme Court of Canada where it was also summarily dismissed only a few months ago.  In essence, the courts said that there was no negligence on the part of the government nor any direct “duty of care” towards the couple in particular, and that the government’s obligation is towards the public in general.  All levels of the court agreed that there were no guarantees of work given to the couple and that they knew of the requirements to become professionally qualified according to Canadian standards, yet they have done nothing to satisfy these requirements. 

Despite the Premakumaran’s inability to win their personal battle in the courts of justice, the war continues to be waged on behalf of many others similarly situated.  In fact, immigrant advocates are becoming more determined than ever to put forward this particular issue at the forefront of the government’s political agenda.  

In response to this recurring complaint, the government officials concerned often harp about the fact that there is nothing much that can be done at the federal level because, while immigration is a matter within the federal jurisdiction, the regulation of trades and professions is within the provincial domain.  Then again, as experts and politicians have confirmed, much remains to be done in terms of addressing the root of the problem and in actually coordinating government efforts at the federal and provincial levels. 

Rhetoric and politics aside, how is this longstanding problem being addressed in concrete terms?

One recent and welcome development within Ontario was the appointment of former MP Jean Augustine as the province’ first Fairness Commissioner.   According to Ontario’s Minister for Citizenship and Immigration Mike Colle, “the Fairness Commissioner will play a vital role in ensuring that Ontario’s regulatory bodies build fair and open registration processes so that internationally trained professionals have the opportunity to put their skills to work.”

The Office of the Fairness Commissioner is a key component of the Fair Access to Regulated Professions Act, 2006, which became law on March 1, 2007.  This law is also part of the province’ comprehensive plan called “Breaking Down Barriersmeant to assist immigrants “integrate successfully into Ontario’s economy and society.”  This plan includes projects involving language training, settlement services, loan assistance, bridge training, information websites, internships, and other forms of funding assistance towards facilitating the integration of foreign-trained professionals within the Canadian system.

Plans, proposals, promises.   Let us all remain vigilant to ensure that this time around, they are not simply made to be broken. 

The author is an  immigration lawyer in Toronto and may be reached at mdsantos@osgoode.yorku.ca

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Changes to the New Caregiver Program – True Reforms or More of the Same?

NB:  This article was submitted for publication before IRCC announced the reduced work experience requirement (from one year to six months) for HCCP and HSW applications that are already in process.  To date, IRCC has not officially started accepting new applications, or released the implementing guidelines, for the new caregiver program which will grant permanent residency at the outset.     Changes to the New Caregiver Program –  True Reforms or More of the Same? CILA(https://cila.co/author/root-2-2-2/) July 2, 2024(https://cila.co/2024/07/02/) Authored by Maria Deanna P. Santos, Immigration Lawyer at Santos Law Office. On 3 June 2024, the IRCC Minister Marc Miller announced changes to the previous Caregiver Pilot Programs which include the following: Caregivers will be granted permanent residence at the outset IRCC is working towards making the caregiver pilot program permanent The language requirement will be lowered to CLB 4 (from the previous CLB 5) T...

The Misrepresentation Trap

Filipiniana News –   November 2019 by Maria Deanna P. Santos Some people are surprised to learn that even a seemingly 'innocent' act of misrepresentation in the immigration context can lead to a five-year bar from reapplying to enter or remain in Canada.  In Canadian immigration law, misrepresentation is defined as “directly or indirectly misrepresenting or withholding material facts relating to a relevant matter that induces or could induce an error in the administration of the Act.”   The "Act", for those who may not be aware, refers to the main source of Canada's immigration law and policy, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). The words, “directly or indirectly,” in the above definition imply that misrepresentation may be committed by the applicant, permanent resident or by other people.   Direct misrepresentation is quite self-explanatory in that it commonly refers to a deliberate act of lying in one's immigration application...

Parental Sponsorship on Hold; 'Amnesty' for Construction Workers

Filipiniana News –   January 2020 by Maria Deanna P. Santos For the start of 2020, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) released the following updates on a couple of its immigration programs which had been much awaited by many and which could potentially have a significant impact on the lives of migrants in Canada.    IRCC Postpones Reopening of Parent-Grandparent Sponsorship Program Many prospective sponsors of parents and grandparents were very disappointed to learn that IRCC has put on hold the parent-grandparent sponsorship program for 2020 until the new ministerial instructions had been released.   No specific date had been provided for their release. In the past years, IRCC had been launching the online interest to sponsor forms at the start of each year to allow prospective sponsors to initiate the sponsorship application process.   Due to various issues which arose from the previous attempts to revise the parental spons...